Pentium J2900 vs A6-9220

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9220
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.80
+1.3%
Pentium J2900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.79

A6-9220 outperforms Pentium J2900 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220 and Pentium J2900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26122632
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Pentium
Power efficiency5.047.47
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$94

Detailed specifications

A6-9220 and Pentium J2900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz2.66 GHz
L1 cache160 KB224 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cacheno data2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220 and Pentium J2900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220 and Pentium J2900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

A6-9220 and Pentium J2900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220 and Pentium J2900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220 and Pentium J2900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.3 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data896 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9220 and Pentium J2900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9220 and Pentium J2900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9220 and Pentium J2900.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9220 0.80
+1.3%
Pentium J2900 0.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9220 1278
+2.2%
Pentium J2900 1250

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 0.79
Integrated graphics card 1.17 0.77
Recency 1 June 2016 1 November 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm

A6-9220 has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, 51.9% faster integrated GPU, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Pentium J2900, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-9220 and Pentium J2900.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220 and Pentium J2900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220
A6-9220
Intel Pentium J2900
Pentium J2900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 403 votes

Rate A6-9220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 78 votes

Rate Pentium J2900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220 or Pentium J2900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.