Celeron M 743 vs A6-9220

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9220
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.80
+433%
Celeron M 743
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.15

A6-9220 outperforms Celeron M 743 by a whopping 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9220 and Celeron M 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26123320
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency5.051.42
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

A6-9220 and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache160 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size124.5 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9220 and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGABGA965
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9220 and Celeron M 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9220 and Celeron M 743 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9220 and Celeron M 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9220 0.80
+433%
Celeron M 743 0.15

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A6-9220 2432
+83.7%
Celeron M 743 1324

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-9220 2253
+287%
Celeron M 743 582

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-9220 27.71
+340%
Celeron M 743 121.8

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.80 0.15
Recency 1 June 2016 1 September 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm

A6-9220 has a 433.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The A6-9220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 743 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9220 and Celeron M 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9220
A6-9220
Intel Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 403 votes

Rate A6-9220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 23 votes

Rate Celeron M 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9220 or Celeron M 743, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.