EPYC 4484PX vs A6-9210

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9210
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.82
EPYC 4484PX
2024
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
33.40
+3973%

EPYC 4484PX outperforms A6-9210 by a whopping 3973% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2614125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.09
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency4.9825.38
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads224
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size124.5 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistors1200 Million17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes828

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9210 0.82
EPYC 4484PX 33.40
+3973%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9210 1248
EPYC 4484PX 51115
+3996%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.82 33.40
Recency 1 June 2016 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 12
Threads 2 24
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 120 Watt

A6-9210 has 1100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4484PX, on the other hand, has a 3973.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4484PX is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9210 in performance tests.

Be aware that A6-9210 is a notebook processor while EPYC 4484PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9210 and EPYC 4484PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9210
A6-9210
AMD EPYC 4484PX
EPYC 4484PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate EPYC 4484PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9210 or EPYC 4484PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.