Celeron N2806 vs A6-9210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9210
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.79
+155%
Celeron N2806
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.31

A6-9210 outperforms Celeron N2806 by a whopping 155% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-9210 and Celeron N2806 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26343107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.987.33
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 December 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

A6-9210 and Celeron N2806 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2 GHz
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache1024 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm22 nm
Die size124.5 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9210 and Celeron N2806 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9210 and Celeron N2806. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

A6-9210 and Celeron N2806 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9210 and Celeron N2806 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9210 and Celeron N2806. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channels11

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R4 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data756 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9210 and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9210 and Celeron N2806 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9210 and Celeron N2806.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes84
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-9210 0.79
+155%
Celeron N2806 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9210 1248
+155%
Celeron N2806 489

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 0.31
Recency 1 June 2016 1 December 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 4 Watt

A6-9210 has a 154.8% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Celeron N2806, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The A6-9210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2806 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9210 and Celeron N2806, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9210
A6-9210
Intel Celeron N2806
Celeron N2806

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron N2806 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9210 or Celeron N2806, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.