Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs A6-9210

Primary details

Comparing A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2616not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency4.98no data
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache1024 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size124.5 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM2
Power consumption (TDP)10-15 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-9210 1248
+58.6%
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 787

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-9210 332
+70.3%
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 195

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-9210 518
+54.6%
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 335

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 89 Watt

A6-9210 has a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 790% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A6-9210 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-9210 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9210
A6-9210
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 151 vote

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 179 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-9210 or Athlon 64 X2 5000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.