Celeron 827 vs A6-7480

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-7480 and Celeron 827 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2384not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.44no data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date26 October 2018 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

A6-7480 and Celeron 827 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache160K64 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)256 KB
L3 cacheno data1.5 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors3,100 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on A6-7480 and Celeron 827 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2+no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-7480 and Celeron 827. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-7480 and Celeron 827 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-7480 and Celeron 827. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-7480 and Celeron 827.

PCIe version3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 17 Watt

A6-7480 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 827, on the other hand, has 164.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-7480 and Celeron 827. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A6-7480 is a desktop processor while Celeron 827 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-7480 and Celeron 827, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-7480
A6-7480
Intel Celeron 827
Celeron 827

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 163 votes

Rate A6-7480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 827 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-7480 or Celeron 827, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.