Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ vs A6-6400K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-6400K
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.95
+352%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.21

A6-6400K outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ by a whopping 352% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25193221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Mobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency1.380.32
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache96 KB128K
L2 cache1024 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nmno data
Die size246 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2754
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt62 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE1-4a, AES, ABM, AVX, BMI1, AMD64, VT, EVP, Turbo Core 3.0no data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR1
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8470Dno data
จำนวนพาธไลน์192no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-6400K 0.95
+352%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-6400K 1502
+351%
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ 333

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 0.21
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 62 Watt

A6-6400K has a 352.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, on the other hand, has 4.8% lower power consumption.

The A6-6400K is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ in performance tests.

Note that A6-6400K is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 3400+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-6400K and Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-6400K
A6-6400K
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3400+
Mobile Athlon 64 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 171 vote

Rate A6-6400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-6400K or Mobile Athlon 64 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.