i5-4400E vs A6-4400M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-4400M
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.65
Core i5-4400E
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
2.09
+222%

Core i5-4400E outperforms A6-4400M by a whopping 222% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-4400M and Core i5-4400E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27601895
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core i5
Power efficiency1.725.25
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Haswell (2013−2015)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 October 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$266

Detailed specifications

A6-4400M and Core i5-4400E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache96 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size246 mm2130 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million960 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-4400M and Core i5-4400E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2FCBGA1364
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt37 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4400M and Core i5-4400E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4400M and Core i5-4400E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4400M and Core i5-4400E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesunknownDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7520GIntel HD Graphics 4600

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-4400M 0.65
i5-4400E 2.09
+222%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-4400M 1010
i5-4400E 3251
+222%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 2.09
Integrated graphics card 0.82 1.84
Recency 15 May 2012 1 October 2013
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 37 Watt

A6-4400M has 5.7% lower power consumption.

i5-4400E, on the other hand, has a 221.5% higher aggregate performance score, 124.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-4400E is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-4400M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4400M and Core i5-4400E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-4400M
A6-4400M
Intel Core i5-4400E
Core i5-4400E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 180 votes

Rate A6-4400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 21 vote

Rate Core i5-4400E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-4400M or Core i5-4400E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.