Opteron 240 EE vs A6-3650

VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-3650 and Opteron 240 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2276not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.24no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)SledgeHammer (2003−2005)
Release date30 June 2011 (13 years ago)February 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3650 and Opteron 240 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.4 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size228 mm2193 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-3650 and Opteron 240 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM1940
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt30 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3650 and Opteron 240 EE are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3650 and Opteron 240 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon HD 6530Dno data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 30 Watt

A6-3650 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 240 EE, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A6-3650 and Opteron 240 EE. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A6-3650 is a desktop processor while Opteron 240 EE is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3650 and Opteron 240 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3650
A6-3650
AMD Opteron 240 EE
Opteron 240 EE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 75 votes

Rate A6-3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 240 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3650 or Opteron 240 EE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.