Ryzen 3 3250U vs A6-3430MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3430MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
0.95
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.49
+162%

Ryzen 3 3250U outperforms A6-3430MX by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3430MX and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25151762
Place by popularitynot in top-10078
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency1.9315.14
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date20 December 2011 (12 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3430MX and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.7 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache128K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A6-3430MX and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FP5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3430MX and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480GMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3430MX and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3430MX and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6520GAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3430MX and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3430MX 0.95
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.49
+162%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-3430MX 1448
Ryzen 3 3250U 3811
+163%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-3430MX 254
Ryzen 3 3250U 749
+195%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-3430MX 681
Ryzen 3 3250U 1454
+114%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 2.49
Integrated graphics card 0.77 2.98
Recency 20 December 2011 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

A6-3430MX has 100% more physical cores.

Ryzen 3 3250U, on the other hand, has a 162.1% higher aggregate performance score, 287% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3250U is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3430MX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3430MX and Ryzen 3 3250U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3430MX
A6-3430MX
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 40 votes

Rate A6-3430MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2108 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3430MX or Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.