Xeon Gold 6558Q vs A6-3400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2647not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency2.03no data
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)no data
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)1 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB60 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480GIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6520Gno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 1 October 2023
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt

A6-3400M has 900% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6558Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

We couldn't decide between A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A6-3400M is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6558Q is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3400M and Xeon Gold 6558Q, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3400M
A6-3400M
Intel Xeon Gold 6558Q
Xeon Gold 6558Q

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 170 votes

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6558Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3400M or Xeon Gold 6558Q, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.