Phenom II X3 N870 vs A6-3400M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-3400M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.76
Phenom II X3 N870
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
1.08
+42.1%

Phenom II X3 N870 outperforms A6-3400M by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-3400M and Phenom II X3 N870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26502418
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series3x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency2.022.87
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)16 December 2010 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-3400M and Phenom II X3 N870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads43
Base clock speed1.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)384 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-3400M and Phenom II X3 N870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-3400M and Phenom II X3 N870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-3400M and Phenom II X3 N870 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-3400M and Phenom II X3 N870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 6520Gno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-3400M 0.76
Phenom II X3 N870 1.08
+42.1%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-3400M 2
Phenom II X3 N870 2
+10.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 1.08
Recency 14 June 2011 16 December 2010
Physical cores 4 3
Threads 4 3
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

A6-3400M has an age advantage of 5 months, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Phenom II X3 N870, on the other hand, has a 42.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Phenom II X3 N870 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3400M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-3400M and Phenom II X3 N870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-3400M
A6-3400M
AMD Phenom II X3 N870
Phenom II X3 N870

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 171 vote

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 33 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-3400M or Phenom II X3 N870, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.