A4-3310MX vs A6-1450

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-1450
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.67
+36.7%
A4-3310MX
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.49

A6-1450 outperforms A4-3310MX by a substantial 37% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-1450 and A4-3310MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27452901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD A-Series
Power efficiency4.221.32
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-1450 and A4-3310MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2228 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-1450 and A4-3310MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3FS1
Power consumption (TDP)8 - 15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-1450 and A4-3310MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-1450 and A4-3310MX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-1450 and A4-3310MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8250 (300 - 400 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-1450 0.67
+36.7%
A4-3310MX 0.49

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A6-1450 1072
+37.1%
A4-3310MX 782

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A6-1450 151
A4-3310MX 292
+93.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A6-1450 446
A4-3310MX 502
+12.6%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-1450 60
A4-3310MX 41.5
+44.6%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A6-1450 1
A4-3310MX 1
+18.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 0.49
Integrated graphics card 0.55 0.66
Recency 23 May 2013 14 June 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 35 Watt

A6-1450 has a 36.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 337.5% lower power consumption.

A4-3310MX, on the other hand, has 20% faster integrated GPU.

The A6-1450 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3310MX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-1450 and A4-3310MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-1450
A6-1450
AMD A4-3310MX
A4-3310MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 38 votes

Rate A6-1450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 29 votes

Rate A4-3310MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-1450 or A4-3310MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.