Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 vs A4 Micro-6400T

Primary details

Comparing A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2721not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency14.24no data
Architecture codenameMullins (2014)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$134

Detailed specifications

A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFT3bBGA956
Power consumption (TDP)4.5 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1333no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R3 Graphicsno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4 Micro-6400T 1082
+124%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4 Micro-6400T 1251
+0.1%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1250

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A4 Micro-6400T 3380
+42%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 2380

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4 Micro-6400T 1664
+66.4%
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1000

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 1 September 2009
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 10 Watt

A4 Micro-6400T has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4 Micro-6400T
A4 Micro-6400T
Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate A4 Micro-6400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4 Micro-6400T or Celeron Dual-Core SU2300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.