Atom N570 vs A4-9120

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-9120
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.77
+267%
Atom N570
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.21

A4-9120 outperforms Atom N570 by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-9120 and Atom N570 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26543205
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Atom
Power efficiency4.862.21
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Pineview (2009−2011)
Release date1 June 2017 (7 years ago)1 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

A4-9120 and Atom N570 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.67 GHz
Bus rateno data666 MHz
L1 cache160 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size124.5 mm287 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-9120 and Atom N570 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGAFCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt8.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9120 and Atom N570. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-

Security technologies

A4-9120 and Atom N570 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9120 and Atom N570 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9120 and Atom N570. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)Intel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-9120 0.77
+267%
Atom N570 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-9120 1217
+257%
Atom N570 341

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.21
Integrated graphics card 1.03 0.01
Recency 1 June 2017 1 March 2011
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 8 Watt

A4-9120 has a 266.7% higher aggregate performance score, 10200% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N570, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

The A4-9120 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom N570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-9120 and Atom N570, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-9120
A4-9120
Intel Atom N570
Atom N570

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 502 votes

Rate A4-9120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 131 vote

Rate Atom N570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-9120 or Atom N570, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.