Pentium M 725 vs A4-7210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-7210
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.04
+478%
Pentium M 725
2004
1 core / 1 thread, 7 Watt
0.18

A4-7210 outperforms Pentium M 725 by a whopping 478% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-7210 and Pentium M 725 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24443268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesPentium M
Power efficiency3.940.81
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)23 June 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-7210 and Pentium M 725 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cacheno data32 KB
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data87 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors930 Million144 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.988V-1.34V

Compatibility

Information on A4-7210 and Pentium M 725 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFT3bPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)12-25 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-7210 and Pentium M 725. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A4-7210 and Pentium M 725 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-7210 and Pentium M 725 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-7210 and Pentium M 725. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR2
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R3 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-7210 and Pentium M 725 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-7210 and Pentium M 725 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-7210 and Pentium M 725.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-7210 1.04
+478%
Pentium M 725 0.18

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4-7210 1732
+23.7%
Pentium M 725 1400

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A4-7210 2681
+292%
Pentium M 725 684

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 0.18
Recency 7 May 2015 23 June 2004
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 7 Watt

A4-7210 has a 477.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium M 725, on the other hand, has 71.4% lower power consumption.

The A4-7210 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium M 725 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-7210 and Pentium M 725, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-7210
A4-7210
Intel Pentium M 725
Pentium M 725

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 161 vote

Rate A4-7210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 8 votes

Rate Pentium M 725 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-7210 or Pentium M 725, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.