Ryzen 5 7520C vs A4-6320
Primary details
Comparing A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2487 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
Power efficiency | 1.40 | no data |
Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
Release date | December 2013 (10 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
L1 cache | 96 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | 100 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 1,303 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM2 | FT6 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | + |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-1600 | DDR5 |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon™ HD 8370D | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) |
Number of pipelines | 128 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7520C has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 433.3% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A4-6320 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 7520C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6320 and Ryzen 5 7520C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.