Core 2 Duo T5800 vs A4-6300

Primary details

Comparing A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2533not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.31no data
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache96 KBno data
L2 cache1024 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °C85 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.075V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
AMTno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon™ HD 8370Dno data
Number of pipelines128no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6300 1426
+127%
Core 2 Duo T5800 628

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-6300 394
+83.3%
Core 2 Duo T5800 215

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-6300 561
+64.5%
Core 2 Duo T5800 341

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2013 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

A4-6300 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T5800, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A4-6300 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Duo T5800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6300 and Core 2 Duo T5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6300
A4-6300
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800
Core 2 Duo T5800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 281 vote

Rate A4-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 80 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6300 or Core 2 Duo T5800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.