Ryzen 9 5900HS vs A4-5300

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5300
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.86
Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
13.60
+1481%

Ryzen 9 5900HS outperforms A4-5300 by a whopping 1481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5300 and Ryzen 9 5900HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2572553
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency1.2536.77
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-5300 and Ryzen 9 5900HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache128K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2180 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-5300 and Ryzen 9 5900HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FP6
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5300 and Ryzen 9 5900HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, XOP, FMA3, FMA4MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5300 and Ryzen 9 5900HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5300 and Ryzen 9 5900HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7480D (724 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2100 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5300 and Ryzen 9 5900HS.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5300 0.86
Ryzen 9 5900HS 13.60
+1481%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-5300 1363
Ryzen 9 5900HS 21595
+1484%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A4-5300 2734
Ryzen 9 5900HS 6380
+133%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A4-5300 4345
Ryzen 9 5900HS 41235
+849%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A4-5300 1
Ryzen 9 5900HS 25
+1620%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A4-5300 107
Ryzen 9 5900HS 2041
+1807%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

A4-5300 67
Ryzen 9 5900HS 237
+253%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

A4-5300 0.91
Ryzen 9 5900HS 2.83
+211%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.86 13.60
Integrated graphics card 0.72 9.06
Recency 2 October 2012 12 January 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 9 5900HS has a 1481.4% higher aggregate performance score, 1158.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 8 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 5900HS is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-5300 in performance tests.

Note that A4-5300 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 5900HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5300 and Ryzen 9 5900HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5300
A4-5300
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 226 votes

Rate A4-5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 177 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5300 or Ryzen 9 5900HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.