Athlon XP 2200+ vs A4-5000

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-5000
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.81
+523%
Athlon XP 2200+
2001
1 core / 1 thread, 68 Watt
0.13

A4-5000 outperforms Athlon XP 2200+ by a whopping 523% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26073339
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency5.110.18
Architecture codenameKabini (2013−2014)Thorton (2001−2003)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$85

Detailed specifications

A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm130 nm
Die size246 mm280 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million63 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT3A
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt68 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVX+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8330no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+ integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-5000 0.81
+523%
Athlon XP 2200+ 0.13

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-5000 1292
+504%
Athlon XP 2200+ 214

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.81 0.13
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 68 Watt

A4-5000 has a 523.1% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 353.3% lower power consumption.

The A4-5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon XP 2200+ in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-5000 is a notebook processor while Athlon XP 2200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-5000 and Athlon XP 2200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-5000
A4-5000
AMD Athlon XP 2200+
Athlon XP 2200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 372 votes

Rate A4-5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 30 votes

Rate Athlon XP 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-5000 or Athlon XP 2200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.