Mobile Sempron M100 vs A4-4000
Aggregate performance score
A4-4000 outperforms Mobile Sempron M100 by a whopping 227% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A4-4000 and Mobile Sempron M100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2703 | 3201 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Mobile Sempron |
| Power efficiency | 1.05 | 0.83 |
| Architecture codename | Richland (2013−2014) | Caspian (2009) |
| Release date | 1 June 2013 (11 years ago) | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A4-4000 and Mobile Sempron M100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A4-4000 and Mobile Sempron M100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FM2 | S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-4000 and Mobile Sempron M100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AMD Virtualization, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, 3DNow, Enhanced Virus Protection, MMX |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-4000 and Mobile Sempron M100 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-4000 and Mobile Sempron M100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7480D | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.72 | 0.22 |
| Recency | 1 June 2013 | 10 September 2009 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
A4-4000 has a 227.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Sempron M100, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.
The A4-4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron M100 in performance tests.
Note that A4-4000 is a desktop processor while Mobile Sempron M100 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A4-4000 and Mobile Sempron M100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
