C-30 vs A4-3310MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3310MX
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.49
+345%

A4-3310MX outperforms C-30 by a whopping 345% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3310MX and C-30 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28853356
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD C-Series
Power efficiency1.321.16
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-3310MX and C-30 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size228 mm275 mm2
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-3310MX and C-30 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3310MX and C-30. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G40 nm, 1.24-1.35V

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3310MX and C-30 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3310MX and C-30. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz)AMD Radeon HD 6250

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3310MX 0.49
+345%
C-30 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3310MX 782
+339%
C-30 178

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.49 0.11
Integrated graphics card 0.66 0.24
Recency 14 June 2011 4 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 9 Watt

A4-3310MX has a 345.5% higher aggregate performance score, 175% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 months, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

C-30, on the other hand, has 288.9% lower power consumption.

The A4-3310MX is our recommended choice as it beats the C-30 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3310MX and C-30, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3310MX
A4-3310MX
AMD C-30
C-30

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 29 votes

Rate A4-3310MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 18 votes

Rate C-30 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3310MX or C-30, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.