Ryzen 9 5900H vs A4-3305M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3305M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47
Ryzen 9 5900H
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
12.94
+2653%

Ryzen 9 5900H outperforms A4-3305M by a whopping 2653% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3305M and Ryzen 9 5900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2921591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency1.2727.20
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Cezanne U (Zen 3) (2021−2022)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)7 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A4-3305M and Ryzen 9 5900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed1.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)4 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size228 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A4-3305M and Ryzen 9 5900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3305M and Ryzen 9 5900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480GXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3305M and Ryzen 9 5900H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3305M and Ryzen 9 5900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6480G (593 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3305M 0.47
Ryzen 9 5900H 12.94
+2653%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-3305M 751
Ryzen 9 5900H 20557
+2637%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 12.94
Integrated graphics card 0.66 9.05
Recency 14 June 2011 7 January 2021
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

A4-3305M has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 5900H, on the other hand, has a 2653.2% higher aggregate performance score, 1271.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 9 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 5900H is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3305M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3305M and Ryzen 9 5900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3305M
A4-3305M
AMD Ryzen 9 5900H
Ryzen 9 5900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 114 votes

Rate A4-3305M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 23 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 5900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3305M or Ryzen 9 5900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.