Athlon 3000G vs A4-1250

VS

Primary details

Comparing A4-1250 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1667
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.27
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Athlon
Power efficiencyno data7.63
Architecture codenameTemash (2013)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date23 May 2013 (11 years ago)7 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-1250 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed1 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache128K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum case temperature (TCase)90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-1250 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFT3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-1250 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
PowerNow-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-1250 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-1250 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB?
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8210AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-1250 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-1250 406
Athlon 3000G 4482
+1004%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A4-1250 97
Athlon 3000G 958
+888%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A4-1250 178
Athlon 3000G 1965
+1004%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 May 2013 7 November 2019
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 35 Watt

A4-1250 has 337.5% lower power consumption.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A4-1250 and Athlon 3000G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A4-1250 is a notebook processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-1250 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-1250
A4-1250
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 24 votes

Rate A4-1250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2061 vote

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-1250 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.