Mobile Sempron 2600+ vs A12-9800

VS

Aggregate performance score

A12-9800
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.27
+1319%
Mobile Sempron 2600+
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16

A12-9800 outperforms Mobile Sempron 2600+ by a whopping 1319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18233291
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.45no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataMobile Sempron
Power efficiency3.310.61
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Dublin
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$139no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L2 cache2048 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nmno data
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+ integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+ integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A12-9800 2.27
+1319%
Mobile Sempron 2600+ 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A12-9800 3611
+1311%
Mobile Sempron 2600+ 256

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.27 0.16
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 25 Watt

A12-9800 has a 1318.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Mobile Sempron 2600+, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.

The A12-9800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 2600+ in performance tests.

Note that A12-9800 is a desktop processor while Mobile Sempron 2600+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800 and Mobile Sempron 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800
A12-9800
AMD Mobile Sempron 2600+
Mobile Sempron 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 197 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Sempron 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800 or Mobile Sempron 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.