A6-9200 SoC vs A12-9800

VS

Primary details

Comparing A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1804not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency3.31no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2125 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FT4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsRadeon R4 2CU
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes88

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 July 2017 31 May 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 10 Watt

A12-9800 has an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A6-9200 SoC, on the other hand, has 550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A12-9800 is a desktop processor while A6-9200 SoC is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A12-9800 and A6-9200 SoC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A12-9800
A12-9800
AMD A6-9200 SoC
A6-9200 SoC

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 195 votes

Rate A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 14 votes

Rate A6-9200 SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A12-9800 or A6-9200 SoC, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.