Ryzen 9 7940HS vs A110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A110 and Ryzen 9 7940HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiencyno data51.70
Architecture codenameStealey (2007)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release dateJune 2007 (17 years ago)January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

A110 and Ryzen 9 7940HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.8 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size66 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors176 million25,000 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A110 and Ryzen 9 7940HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketIntel BGA 437FP8
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A110 and Ryzen 9 7940HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A110 and Ryzen 9 7940HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and Ryzen 9 7940HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A110 and Ryzen 9 7940HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 35 Watt

A110 has 1066.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7940HS, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A110 and Ryzen 9 7940HS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A110 and Ryzen 9 7940HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel A110
A110
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
Ryzen 9 7940HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate A110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 992 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7940HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A110 or Ryzen 9 7940HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.