Athlon II P320 vs A110
Primary details
Comparing A110 and Athlon II P320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon II |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| Release date | June 2007 (17 years ago) | 12 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A110 and Athlon II P320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A110 and Athlon II P320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | S1g4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A110 and Athlon II P320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVM |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A110 and Athlon II P320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 25 Watt |
A110 has 733.3% lower power consumption.
Athlon II P320, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A110 and Athlon II P320. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A110 and Athlon II P320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
