Xeon 3.4 vs A100
Primary details
Comparing A100 and Xeon 3.4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Irwindale (2004) |
| Release date | June 2007 (17 years ago) | June 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A100 and Xeon 3.4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 66 mm2 | 169 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 176 million | 178 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A100 and Xeon 3.4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 437 | 604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A100 and Xeon 3.4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A100 and Xeon 3.4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 135 Watt |
A100 has 4400% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A100 and Xeon 3.4. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A100 is a notebook processor while Xeon 3.4 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A100 and Xeon 3.4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
