Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs A10 PRO-7850B

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10 PRO-7850B
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.18
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.20
+781%

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS outperforms A10 PRO-7850B by a whopping 781% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1840298
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.1740.38
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date31 July 2014 (10 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3.7 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size245 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors2,411 million25,000 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FP7
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
RAID+-
HSA+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon 780M
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10 PRO-7850B 2.18
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS 19.20
+781%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10 PRO-7850B 3459
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS 30494
+782%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.18 19.20
Recency 31 July 2014 16 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS has a 780.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 111.1% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is our recommended choice as it beats the A10 PRO-7850B in performance tests.

Note that A10 PRO-7850B is a desktop processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 PRO-7850B and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 PRO-7850B
A10 PRO-7850B
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 7 votes

Rate A10 PRO-7850B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 PRO-7850B or Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.