Ultra 9 185H vs A10-9700E

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9700E
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.04
Core Ultra 9 185H
2023
16 cores / 22 threads, 45 Watt
18.51
+807%

Core Ultra 9 185H outperforms A10-9700E by a whopping 807% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1911324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency5.5138.90
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date27 July 2017 (7 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$640

Detailed specifications

A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads422
Base clock speed3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C110 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4Intel BGA 2049
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel Arc 8-Cores iGPU ( - 2350 MHz)
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes88

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9700E 2.04
Ultra 9 185H 18.51
+807%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9700E 3242
Ultra 9 185H 29403
+807%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.04 18.51
Recency 27 July 2017 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 22
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

A10-9700E has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 185H, on the other hand, has a 807.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 450% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Core Ultra 9 185H is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9700E in performance tests.

Note that A10-9700E is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 9 185H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9700E and Core Ultra 9 185H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9700E
A10-9700E
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
Core Ultra 9 185H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 53 votes

Rate A10-9700E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 425 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 185H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9700E or Core Ultra 9 185H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.