Ryzen 7 8700F vs A10-9620P

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-9620P
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.60
Ryzen 7 8700F
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
19.53
+1121%

Ryzen 7 8700F outperforms A10-9620P by a whopping 1121% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 8700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2106292
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.77
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesBristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency10.0928.43
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Phoenix (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$270

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 8700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed2.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size250 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 8700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4AM5
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 8700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 8700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 8700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 8700F.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-9620P 1.60
Ryzen 7 8700F 19.53
+1121%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9620P 2538
Ryzen 7 8700F 31015
+1122%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.60 19.53
Recency 1 January 2017 1 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

A10-9620P has 333.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 8700F, on the other hand, has a 1120.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 8700F is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-9620P in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-9620P is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 8700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Ryzen 7 8700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
Ryzen 7 8700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 313 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 256 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 8700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9620P or Ryzen 7 8700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.