Phenom II X4 975 BE vs A10-9620P
Primary details
Comparing A10-9620P and Phenom II X4 975 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2093 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.09 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Deneb (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 1 January 2017 (7 years ago) | 4 January 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-9620P and Phenom II X4 975 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | 258 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3100 Million | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on A10-9620P and Phenom II X4 975 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Phenom II X4 975 BE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Phenom II X4 975 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-9620P and Phenom II X4 975 BE.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2017 | 4 January 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
A10-9620P has an age advantage of 5 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-9620P and Phenom II X4 975 BE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A10-9620P is a notebook processor while Phenom II X4 975 BE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Phenom II X4 975 BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
