Core 2 Duo P7350 vs A10-9620P

Primary details

Comparing A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P7350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2091not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesBristol RidgeIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency10.09no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date1 January 2017 (7 years ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P7350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Bus rateno data1066 MHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2 MB3 MB
L3 cacheno data3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size250 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors3100 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.062V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P7350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4BGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P7350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P7350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P7350 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P7350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-9620P 2535
+239%
Core 2 Duo P7350 748

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-9620P 503
+110%
Core 2 Duo P7350 240

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-9620P 1115
+181%
Core 2 Duo P7350 397

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-9620P 2277
+6.4%
Core 2 Duo P7350 2140

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-9620P 7420
+83.8%
Core 2 Duo P7350 4036

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A10-9620P 14.41
+166%
Core 2 Duo P7350 38.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2017 15 July 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

A10-9620P has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P7350. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-9620P and Core 2 Duo P7350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-9620P
A10-9620P
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
Core 2 Duo P7350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 312 votes

Rate A10-9620P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 66 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-9620P or Core 2 Duo P7350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.