i7-8670 vs A10-8700P
Primary details
Comparing A10-8700P and Core i7-8670 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2214 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | AMD Carrizo | Intel Core i7 |
Power efficiency | 3.81 | no data |
Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
Release date | 3 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 January 2018 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-8700P and Core i7-8670 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 12 |
Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 2048 KB | 256K (per core) |
L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | no data | 149 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 3100 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-8700P and Core i7-8670 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FP4 | 1151 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 - 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and Core i7-8670. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | AVX | + |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
SIPP | - | + |
Security technologies
A10-8700P and Core i7-8670 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and Core i7-8670 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and Core i7-8670. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and Core i7-8670 integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-8700P and Core i7-8670 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and Core i7-8670.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 3 June 2015 | 1 January 2018 |
Physical cores | 4 | 6 |
Threads | 4 | 12 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 65 Watt |
A10-8700P has 441.7% lower power consumption.
i7-8670, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between A10-8700P and Core i7-8670. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A10-8700P is a notebook processor while Core i7-8670 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and Core i7-8670, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.