A4-9120C vs A10-8700P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-8700P
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.41
+161%
A4-9120C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.54

A10-8700P outperforms A4-9120C by a whopping 161% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-8700P and A4-9120C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21972841
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency3.818.52
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-8700P and A4-9120C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-8700P and A4-9120C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4BGA
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 35 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-8700P and A4-9120C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0Virtualization,
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-8700P and A4-9120C are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-8700P and A4-9120C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R6 GraphicsAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-8700P and A4-9120C integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-8700P and A4-9120C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-8700P and A4-9120C.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-8700P 1.41
+161%
A4-9120C 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-8700P 2245
+164%
A4-9120C 850

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 0.54
Recency 3 June 2015 6 January 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 6 Watt

A10-8700P has a 161.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A4-9120C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% lower power consumption.

The A10-8700P is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-9120C in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-8700P and A4-9120C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-8700P
A10-8700P
AMD A4-9120C
A4-9120C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 119 votes

Rate A10-8700P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 77 votes

Rate A4-9120C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-8700P or A4-9120C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.