Celeron G3930 vs A10-7890K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7890K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.31
+57.1%

A10-7890K outperforms Celeron G3930 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18252190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.330.69
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.222.63
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date11 January 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3930 has 109% better value for money than A10-7890K.

Detailed specifications

A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed4 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
Multiplierno data29
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C65 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2+FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics 610
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
OpenGLno data4.4
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7890K 2.31
+57.1%
Celeron G3930 1.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7890K 3533
+57.1%
Celeron G3930 2249

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.31 1.47
Recency 11 January 2016 3 January 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 51 Watt

A10-7890K has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G3930, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 86.3% lower power consumption.

The A10-7890K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3930 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and Celeron G3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7890K
A10-7890K
Intel Celeron G3930
Celeron G3930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 123 votes

Rate A10-7890K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 237 votes

Rate Celeron G3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7890K or Celeron G3930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.