Celeron G3930 vs A10-7890K
Aggregate performance score
A10-7890K outperforms Celeron G3930 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1825 | 2190 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.33 | 0.69 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 2.22 | 2.63 |
Architecture codename | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
Release date | 11 January 2016 (8 years ago) | 3 January 2017 (7 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $150 | $42 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron G3930 has 109% better value for money than A10-7890K.
Detailed specifications
A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2.9 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
Bus rate | no data | 8 GT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 29 |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 65 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | FM2+ | FCLGA1151 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 51 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | - |
AVX | AVX | - |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | - |
EDB | no data | + |
Secure Key | no data | + |
MPX | - | + |
Identity Protection | - | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR4 2133, DDR3L 1333/1600 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 610 |
iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 512 | no data |
Max video memory | no data | 64 GB |
Quick Sync Video | - | + |
Clear Video | no data | + |
Clear Video HD | no data | + |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.05 GHz |
InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | no data | + |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Max resolution over eDP | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 4096x2304@60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and Celeron G3930.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.31 | 1.47 |
Recency | 11 January 2016 | 3 January 2017 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 51 Watt |
A10-7890K has a 57.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron G3930, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 86.3% lower power consumption.
The A10-7890K is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3930 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and Celeron G3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.