Celeron 220 vs A10-7890K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-7890K and Celeron 220 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1828not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.22no data
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release date11 January 2016 (8 years ago)October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7890K and Celeron 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size246 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on A10-7890K and Celeron 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt19 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A10-7890K and Celeron 220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 220 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and Celeron 220 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 220 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and Celeron 220.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7890K 3539
+1593%
Celeron 220 209

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 19 Watt

A10-7890K has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 220, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-7890K and Celeron 220. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A10-7890K is a desktop processor while Celeron 220 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and Celeron 220, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7890K
A10-7890K
Intel Celeron 220
Celeron 220

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 123 votes

Rate A10-7890K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 59 votes

Rate Celeron 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7890K or Celeron 220, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.