A4-6320B vs A10-7890K
Primary details
Comparing A10-7890K and A4-6320B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1828 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.32 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 2.22 | no data |
Architecture codename | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Richland (2013−2014) |
Release date | 11 January 2016 (8 years ago) | March 2014 (10 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $150 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
A10-7890K and A4-6320B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 4 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 96K |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 246 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 70 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 1,303 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-7890K and A4-6320B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM2+ | FM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and A4-6320B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | FMA4 | + |
AVX | AVX | + |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | + |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and A4-6320B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and A4-6320B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR3-1600 |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Radeon HD 8370D |
iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 512 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and A4-6320B integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-7890K and A4-6320B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and A4-6320B.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
A10-7890K has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.
A4-6320B, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-7890K and A4-6320B. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and A4-6320B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.