A8-6500 vs A10-7890K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7890K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.27
+25.4%
A8-6500
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.81

A10-7890K outperforms A8-6500 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7890K and A8-6500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18282013
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.222.59
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date11 January 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$150no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7890K and A8-6500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache256 KB192 KB
L2 cache4096 KB4096 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7890K and A8-6500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+FM2
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7890K and A8-6500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4FMA4
AVXAVXAVX
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect++
HSA+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7890K and A8-6500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7890K and A8-6500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-1866
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon HD 8570D
iGPU core count8no data
Number of pipelines512256
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7890K and A8-6500 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7890K and A8-6500 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12DirectX® 11
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7890K and A8-6500.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7890K 2.27
+25.4%
A8-6500 1.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7890K 3533
+25.3%
A8-6500 2820

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.27 1.81
Recency 11 January 2016 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

A10-7890K has a 25.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

A8-6500, on the other hand, has 46.2% lower power consumption.

The A10-7890K is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-6500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7890K and A8-6500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7890K
A10-7890K
AMD A8-6500
A8-6500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 123 votes

Rate A10-7890K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 104 votes

Rate A8-6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7890K or A8-6500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.