A10-7890K vs A10-6800K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6800K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.01
A10-7890K
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.23
+10.9%

A10-7890K outperforms A10-6800K by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6800K and A10-7890K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19201830
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.330.39
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.902.22
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Godaveri (2014−2016)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)11 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$142$150

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A10-7890K has 18% better value for money than A10-6800K.

Detailed specifications

A10-6800K and A10-7890K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4.1 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache192 KB256 KB
L2 cache4096 KB4096 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °C72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C74 °C
Number of transistors1,303 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on A10-6800K and A10-7890K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6800K and A10-7890K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow++
PowerGating++
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect++
HSA-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6800K and A10-7890K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6800K and A10-7890K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3-2133
Max memory channels22

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8670DAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Number of pipelines384512
Enduro++
Switchable graphics++
UVD++
VCE++

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6800K and A10-7890K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort++
HDMI++

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6800K and A10-7890K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11DirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6800K and A10-7890K.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6800K 2.01
A10-7890K 2.23
+10.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6800K 3186
A10-7890K 3539
+11.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

A10-6800K 4160
A10-7890K 4450
+7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 2.23
Recency 1 June 2013 11 January 2016
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 95 Watt

A10-7890K has a 10.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 5.3% lower power consumption.

The A10-7890K is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6800K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6800K and A10-7890K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6800K
A10-6800K
AMD A10-7890K
A10-7890K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 437 votes

Rate A10-6800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 123 votes

Rate A10-7890K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6800K or A10-7890K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.