Celeron M 310 vs A10-7700K

VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-7700K and Celeron M 310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1908not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Celeron M
Power efficiency2.01no data
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Banias (2003)
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$152no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7700K and Celeron M 310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache256 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cache0 KB512 KB L2
Chip lithography28 nm130 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.356V

Compatibility

Information on A10-7700K and Celeron M 310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFM2+H-PBGA479, PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt24.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7700K and Celeron M 310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VTno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

A10-7700K and Celeron M 310 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7700K and Celeron M 310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7700K and Celeron M 310. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7700K and Celeron M 310 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7700K and Celeron M 310 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7700K and Celeron M 310.

PCIe version3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 24 Watt

A10-7700K has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 310, on the other hand, has 295.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-7700K and Celeron M 310. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A10-7700K is a desktop processor while Celeron M 310 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7700K and Celeron M 310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7700K
A10-7700K
Intel Celeron M 310
Celeron M 310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 158 votes

Rate A10-7700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 6 votes

Rate Celeron M 310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7700K or Celeron M 310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.