i7-840QM vs A10-7700K

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-7700K
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
2.01
+63.4%
Core i7-840QM
2010
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
1.23

A10-7700K outperforms Core i7-840QM by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19282325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.32no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)Intel Core i7
Power efficiency2.002.59
Architecture codenameGodaveri (2014−2016)Clarksfield (2009−2010)
Release date14 January 2014 (10 years ago)22 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$152$568

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2+FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VTIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
HSA+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsNone
iGPU core count6no data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM.

PCIe version3.02
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-7700K 2.01
+63.4%
i7-840QM 1.23

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-7700K 3193
+63.6%
i7-840QM 1952

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-7700K 3004
i7-840QM 3439
+14.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-7700K 9821
+6%
i7-840QM 9266

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10-7700K 4500
+27.4%
i7-840QM 3532

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A10-7700K 13.7
+192%
i7-840QM 40

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A10-7700K 3
+4.2%
i7-840QM 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 1.23
Recency 14 January 2014 22 June 2010
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 45 Watt

A10-7700K has a 63.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

i7-840QM, on the other hand, has 100% more threads, and 111.1% lower power consumption.

The A10-7700K is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-840QM in performance tests.

Note that A10-7700K is a desktop processor while Core i7-840QM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7700K and Core i7-840QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-7700K
A10-7700K
Intel Core i7-840QM
Core i7-840QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 158 votes

Rate A10-7700K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 81 vote

Rate Core i7-840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-7700K or Core i7-840QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.