Opteron 240 EE vs A10-7300
Primary details
Comparing A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2395 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Server |
Series | AMD Kaveri | no data |
Power efficiency | 5.47 | no data |
Architecture codename | Kaveri (2014−2015) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
Release date | 4 June 2014 (10 years ago) | February 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.9 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Die size | 245 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 2410 Million | 106 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | FP3 | 940 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
FMA | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
FRTC | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | - |
PowerGating | + | - |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | - |
HSA | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R6 Graphics | no data |
iGPU core count | 6 | no data |
Enduro | + | - |
Switchable graphics | + | - |
UVD | + | - |
VCE | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 4 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 19 Watt | 30 Watt |
A10-7300 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 57.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A10-7300 is a notebook processor while Opteron 240 EE is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A10-7300 and Opteron 240 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.