EPYC 7702P vs A10-6790K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-6790K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.94
EPYC 7702P
2019
64 cores / 128 threads, 200 Watt
39.85
+1954%

EPYC 7702P outperforms A10-6790K by a whopping 1954% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking195864
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.68
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.8318.84
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date28 October 2013 (11 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,425

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.35 GHz
Multiplierno data20
L1 cache192 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size246 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFM2TR4
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVXAVX+
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8670Dno data
จำนวนพาธไลน์384no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-6790K 1.94
EPYC 7702P 39.85
+1954%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-6790K 3089
EPYC 7702P 63300
+1949%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-6790K 357
EPYC 7702P 888
+149%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-6790K 850
EPYC 7702P 15480
+1721%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.94 39.85
Recency 28 October 2013 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 200 Watt

A10-6790K has 100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7702P, on the other hand, has a 1954.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7702P is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-6790K in performance tests.

Note that A10-6790K is a desktop processor while EPYC 7702P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-6790K and EPYC 7702P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-6790K
A10-6790K
AMD EPYC 7702P
EPYC 7702P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 49 votes

Rate A10-6790K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 33 votes

Rate EPYC 7702P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-6790K or EPYC 7702P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.