i3-9100E vs A10-5800K

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5800K
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.93
Core i3-9100E
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.49
+133%

Core i3-9100E outperforms A10-5800K by a whopping 133% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5800K and Core i3-9100E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19741346
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.28no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Series (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.766.30
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date2 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$122no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-5800K and Core i3-9100E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size246 mm2126 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on A10-5800K and Core i3-9100E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM21151
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5800K and Core i3-9100E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

A10-5800K and Core i3-9100E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5800K and Core i3-9100E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5800K and Core i3-9100E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7660DIntel UHD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5800K and Core i3-9100E.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5800K 1.93
i3-9100E 4.49
+133%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5800K 2961
i3-9100E 6868
+132%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.93 4.49
Integrated graphics card 1.30 3.09
Recency 2 October 2012 1 September 2018
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 65 Watt

i3-9100E has a 132.6% higher aggregate performance score, 137.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 53.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-9100E is our recommended choice as it beats the A10-5800K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5800K and Core i3-9100E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5800K
A10-5800K
Intel Core i3-9100E
Core i3-9100E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 501 vote

Rate A10-5800K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Core i3-9100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5800K or Core i3-9100E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.