Turion II Neo K645 vs A10-5757M

VS

Primary details

Comparing A10-5757M and Turion II Neo K645 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1944not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Turion II Neo
Power efficiency5.25no data
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Geneva (2010)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)15 December 2010 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-5757M and Turion II Neo K645 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data3200 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-5757M and Turion II Neo K645 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP2S1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5757M and Turion II Neo K645. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5757M and Turion II Neo K645 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5757M and Turion II Neo K645. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8650Gno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2013 15 December 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

A10-5757M has an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Turion II Neo K645, on the other hand, has 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A10-5757M and Turion II Neo K645. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5757M and Turion II Neo K645, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5757M
A10-5757M
AMD Turion II Neo K645
Turion II Neo K645

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 45 votes

Rate A10-5757M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Turion II Neo K645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5757M or Turion II Neo K645, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.