Athlon II X4 645 vs A10-5757M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5757M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.94
+31.1%
Athlon II X4 645
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.48

A10-5757M outperforms Athlon II X4 645 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5757M and Athlon II X4 645 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19592167
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency5.251.47
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)21 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A10-5757M and Athlon II X4 645 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2169 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-5757M and Athlon II X4 645 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP2AM3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5757M and Athlon II X4 645. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5757M and Athlon II X4 645 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5757M and Athlon II X4 645. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8650G (600 - 720 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5757M and Athlon II X4 645.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5757M 1.94
+31.1%
Athlon II X4 645 1.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5757M 3084
+31.2%
Athlon II X4 645 2351

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A10-5757M 372
+16.3%
Athlon II X4 645 320

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A10-5757M 801
Athlon II X4 645 969
+21%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.94 1.48
Recency 1 June 2013 21 September 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

A10-5757M has a 31.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The A10-5757M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 645 in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-5757M is a notebook processor while Athlon II X4 645 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5757M and Athlon II X4 645, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5757M
A10-5757M
AMD Athlon II X4 645
Athlon II X4 645

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 46 votes

Rate A10-5757M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 394 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5757M or Athlon II X4 645, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.