Athlon 5370 vs A10-5750M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-5750M
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.37
+14.2%
Athlon 5370
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.20

A10-5750M outperforms Athlon 5370 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-5750M and Athlon 5370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22262337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD A-Seriesno data
Power efficiency3.694.52
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)9 April 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-5750M and Athlon 5370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size246 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A10-5750M and Athlon 5370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1r2AM1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-5750M and Athlon 5370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI++
FMA+FMA4
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-5750M and Athlon 5370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-5750M and Athlon 5370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8650GAMD Radeon R3 Graphics
Number of pipelinesno data128
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10-5750M and Athlon 5370 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10-5750M and Athlon 5370 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10-5750M and Athlon 5370.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-5750M 1.37
+14.2%
Athlon 5370 1.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-5750M 2174
+14.1%
Athlon 5370 1905

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 1.20
Recency 1 June 2013 9 April 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

A10-5750M has a 14.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon 5370, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 40% lower power consumption.

The A10-5750M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 5370 in performance tests.

Be aware that A10-5750M is a notebook processor while Athlon 5370 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-5750M and Athlon 5370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-5750M
A10-5750M
AMD Athlon 5370
Athlon 5370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 251 vote

Rate A10-5750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 14 votes

Rate Athlon 5370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-5750M or Athlon 5370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.