Phenom II X3 N850 vs A10-4600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A10-4600M
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.22
+54.4%
Phenom II X3 N850
2010
3 cores / 3 threads, 35 Watt
0.79

A10-4600M outperforms Phenom II X3 N850 by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A10-4600M and Phenom II X3 N850 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23212614
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-Series3x AMD Phenom II
Power efficiency3.302.14
Architecture codenameTrinity (2012−2013)Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A10-4600M and Phenom II X3 N850 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads43
Base clock speed2.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rateno data3600 MHz
L1 cache192 KB384 KB
L2 cache4 MB (shared)1.5 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A10-4600M and Phenom II X3 N850 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2S1 (S1g4)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10-4600M and Phenom II X3 N850. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA86x MMX(+), 3DNow!(+), SSE(1,2,3,4A),-64, AMD-V
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10-4600M and Phenom II X3 N850 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10-4600M and Phenom II X3 N850. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 7660G (497 - 686 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A10-4600M 1.22
+54.4%
Phenom II X3 N850 0.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A10-4600M 1938
+54.7%
Phenom II X3 N850 1253

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A10-4600M 2078
+8.1%
Phenom II X3 N850 1922

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A10-4600M 5696
+10.2%
Phenom II X3 N850 5169

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A10-4600M 2866
+10.9%
Phenom II X3 N850 2584

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A10-4600M 26.49
Phenom II X3 N850 23.4
+13.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.22 0.79
Recency 15 May 2012 4 October 2010
Physical cores 4 3
Threads 4 3
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

A10-4600M has a 54.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The A10-4600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X3 N850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10-4600M and Phenom II X3 N850, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10-4600M
A10-4600M
AMD Phenom II X3 N850
Phenom II X3 N850

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 501 vote

Rate A10-4600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 30 votes

Rate Phenom II X3 N850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10-4600M or Phenom II X3 N850, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.